DS 004
Centrality
of Grace
Jonah
1:1-3; 3:1-4:11
Grace is a concept we find difficult at best. Far more than grace,
we are enamored with retribution, revenge, and violence as solutions
to conflict. It is hard for us to accept grace for ourselves, just as
it is hard for us not to feel cheated when we see grace lavished on
others. We want to categorize grace as a display of weakness. We like
to consider violence as the demonstration of true strength. In the
end, grace falls by the wayside in our lives. So why would we
consider it an important concept when it is so often absent in the
world we inhabit?
The Jonah story begins with a man who knows about grace, but does
not want God to use grace toward his enemies. Yahweh called Jonah as
a prophet, giving him a specific mission to take a word of warning to
the enemies of Israel. This was not something Jonah wished to do. He
much preferred the idea of Yahweh destroying the enemies of his
people. He decided to flee instead of being obedient to the
instructions and call set before him.
Jonah took passage on a ship heading the opposite direction from
Nineveh. He determined to go to the opposite end of the world to
escape the mission before him. He wanted his enemies to die. He
wanted God to go ahead and condemn them. He wanted no part in taking
them a message they might heed, thus enabling them to avoid the
calamity Yahweh was promising to send upon them.
We mostly know the story of the big fish that swallowed Jonah and
coughed him out on the shore near Nineveh. We so often hear Jonah's
story as a miracle story used as a test case for proving God's
intervention in the world. We concern ourselves with how Jonah could
stay alive in a fish for three days. Perhaps we should wonder,
instead how a fish could circumnavigate the continent of Africa in
three days (some 12,000 miles), as there is no other water connection
between the Mediterranean and the coast near Nineveh. All of that
kind of speculation, however, misses the point of the story at hand.
It places undue emphasis on the particulars of the story and
sidesteps the issues of Jonah's anger, xenophobia, hate, and desire
to circumvent Yahweh's desire to treat one and all with grace and
mercy.
In spite of our differences in culture, language, morals, and life
priorities, this story is about God's care for all life in all its
forms. It is the story of how a prophet of Yahweh may fail to adopt
the principles and values of Yahweh's love, care, mercy, and grace
toward all people, all cultures, all nations, and all other forms of
life.
This prophetic text is not about the miracles described in Jonah's
transit across the sea. It is about the attitudes of Yahweh's people
who harbored resentment, anger, and vitriol against a foreign people
whom Yahweh desired to care, protect, and redeem, even as Yahweh had
redeemed Israel. The text is about grace. It is about God's will to
shower mercy and redeem people not because of their righteous deeds,
but precisely because their unrighteousness cries for mercy, grace,
redemption, and a new way forward.
It is not that Jonah was not justified in wanting to condemn the
people of Nineveh. He had every reason we would give to want to
condemn our own enemies. The people of Nineveh were idolatrous. They
were known to abuse their enemies harshly. They were known to rip
open pregnant women to kill their unborn babies. They were known to
torture victims taken in war. They were known for all sorts of
atrocities against Israel and other nations. No, Jonah could feel
very justified in desiring to obliterate the Ninevites by refusing to
give them a chance to repent and so avoid Yahweh's punishment.
Jonah had the same reasons to desire to see Yahweh inflict
condemnation and retribution upon his hated enemies as the people of
the United States have felt justified in condemning and wishing to
kill those responsible for the atrocities of 9/11. His were the same
reasons modern Israel has to hold those attacking Israel responsible
for the atrocities committed against them. His were the same reasons
modern Palestinians have to hold Israel and the West responsible for
the plight under which they live. These are the same reasons we have
ever given for casting condemnation upon any group of people we
consider less than worthy of our care, love, and positive attention.
Jonah was justified in his attitudes. He was responding to the
nationalistic and patriotic cries of his people in response to their
oppressors. His anger against Nineveh had merit. It had a foundation
in atrocities and war crimes. It was based on the knowledge that
Nineveh wanted to destroy Israel and subjugate the land and all its
inhabitants. He knew that if Nineveh had their way he and his loved
ones would be killed or enslaved. Jonah had every right to be angry,
every right to pray for the destruction of these wicked people. He
had every reason under the sun to do anything and everything in his
power to seek their condemnation and complete destruction.
The problem was that Yahweh was of a different mindset. Jonah knew
that, but he was set in his self-justified anger against an
oppressing nation.
Instead of offering condemnation to a nation of oppressors, Yahweh
wanted to send Jonah with a message of repentance that would allow
them to avoid Yahweh's condemnation. Jonah did not want to go. He
took off in the opposite direction. Once he found himself unable to
avoid Yahweh's call on his life, he charged through Nineveh,
preaching Yahweh's warning in one day. This was a rush job as it
normally took three days to walk through the city.
His point seems to have been that he would obey, but he would do
so in the least productive manner he could manage. It would seem he
probably did not shower and change clothes to quell the reek of fish.
He ran through the city as fast as he could, delivered his message as
recklessly as he could, and then lay down at an overlook hoping to
see Yahweh bring condemnation down upon his enemies.
He was as sorely disappointed by the outcome as groups like
Westboro Baptist Church who have prayed for God's condemnation upon
gays, lesbians, and others whose lives they find abhorrent. He was as
disappointed as soldiers from both sides of the Civil War praying to
the same God for victory over their enemies. Our tendency has ever
been to determine that we must be on the correct side of an argument
and the only valid response is for God to take our position against
those who would disagree with us.
We tend to see the only appropriate response from God as
condemnation and the violent destruction of those we would write off.
Our attitudes toward those we condemn take priority over God's
attitudes toward those same people.
This was the difficulty Jonah was facing. He wanted to condemn. He
wanted revenge. He wanted God to side with him. He wanted God to
vindicate his desires to act and respond in anger, violence, and
purge his enemies as being the solution to Israel's problems.
Xenophobia, hate, anger, and malice toward his enemies were attitudes
to which Jonah justifiably clung. Justifiably as far as he was
concerned, as far as we are concerned, but not justifiably in terms
Yahweh was willing to accept.
Instead of condemnation, Yahweh offered a way out. Yahweh offered
a path of change, a path of repentance, a new way forward. Instead of
sending Jonah to condemn Nineveh, Yahweh had sent Jonah to offer a
word of warning. By Jonah's own admission, he had understood all
along that Yahweh is a forgiving, merciful God. God deals in grace
toward those who indeed deserve condemnation.
Yahweh's message through Jonah was that Nineveh needed a course
correction to avoid condemnation. It was a corrective, restorative
message of grace. It was a message of redemption through grace.
This was what Jonah knew about the character of Yahweh. It was
also the reason he had rebelled against Yahweh. He knew that this
redeeming grace was central to Yahweh's character and dealings with
people. Grace was not central for Jonah, however. That is why Jonah
had fled in the first place. He did not want to coordinate his life
and attitudes according to the centrality of grace in Yahweh. Are we
any different?
—Pr. Christopher B. Harbin
©
Copyright 2017 Christopher B. Harbin.
Comments
Post a Comment