After Pentecost Devotional - Day 45

“When you lend money to people, you are allowed to keep something of theirs as a guarantee that they will pay back the loan. But don’t take one or both of their millstones, or else they may starve. They need these stones for grinding grain into flour to make bread.” Deuteronomy 24:6

There is much more to the economic instructions in the Bible than we tend to believe. The various principles speak to all sorts of applications, but the general sense is very simple. God desired to protect the weak and poor from oppression by those with power and wealth. God wanted all people to have appropriate access to the resources of the land and the production of wealth.

Specifically here, we see the question of lending addressed. Surety or collateral was deemed as an option to guarantee repayment of a loan, but here we find restrictions. One loaning money could not take as collateral something that would impede the person in need from using the tools of their trade. A millstone could not be taken, as that would mean that grain could not be ground to make flour.

That might seem a little too obvious, as we can easily understand that a worker needs the tools of the trade in order to make repayment on a loan. That is precisely, however, why one loaning money would want to take their tools. The whole point of making one give up a millstone was to force them to default on the loan. It was a strategy designed to use one's circumstances to oppress and take the rest of their resources while feigning assistance and moral superiority.

Loans were supposed to be used to actually help those in need. They were to be acts of generosity, mercy, care, love, and grace. They were supposed to be expressions that one understood the other's needs, expressions of empathy. They were supposed to recognize that the nation as a whole depended on one another and upon Yahweh's grace in order to meet all of their needs. When one had excess, it was to be used to assist any who did not have enough.

The principles were simple. They were predicated on the manner in which Yahweh had led the people out of Egyptian bondage. They were based on the character of Yahweh as the God who had come out of nowhere to redeem Israel. As Yahweh had intervened to assist a people crying for a way out of their desperation, so the nation was to look upon its poor according to the mercy they had experienced under Yahweh's care.

Yahweh had been gracious. They were to be gracious. They were not to deprive one another either in terms of denying a loan to the poor, nor engaging in strategies to take advantage of those will lesser resources and the recourse to protect themselves.

We hear some talk about predatory lending in our nation as the obvious example of how we take advantage of our poorest. That fails to recognize and address, however, that the poor go to predatory lenders because the normal channels for loans are not available to them. Banks lend to the wealthy, while loan sharks prey on the desperate. As a nation, we fail to measure up to Yahweh's economic principles of caring for one another.

Determine what changes God would have you make in your economic attitudes.


"Lord, grant me the courage to see others according to the designs of your grace."

—©Copyright 2016, Christopher B. Harbin
http://www.sermonsearch.com/contributors/104427/ 
My latest books can be found here on amazon

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Gospel Is Not Conservative

Image
Fundamentalism and conservativism are intrinsically averse to change. They are tied with conserving a status quo or moving back to a former era. They seek a safe place, a respite from change and transformation in the world around them. They are threatened by new ideas. They fear that the foundations on which they base their lives will be uprooted, causing their view of reality to fall apart. Growth depends on change. Life requires change. Survival depends on responding to changes in our environment. It requires new ideas. It requires new answers to old questions, as well as new questions with even newer answers. Jesus was by no means conservative. Jesus challenged the status quo. He fought against the groundwork of much of the religious thought around him, as well as the structures erected to empower its values. He called out those who benefited from social, religious, and political power. He demonstrated God's love, forgiveness and grace to those deemed una...
Read more

God in the Hands of Angry Sinners

Image
Jonathan Edwards’ famous sermon, “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God,” set a very poor direction for much of Christianity in the Colonies. His Puritan tradition presented God as an essentially angry deity whose desire was to condemn and torture. Grace or mercy existed simply in regard to how long God waited until calling down judgment upon sinners. That is not good news. It never was. Such is not the message of Jesus whom the gospel writers claim as good news. They echo the words of the celestial messengers declaring Jesus’ birth as good news of great joy to all peoples. Rather than look to Jesus as the clearest example of God’s identity, character, and will, that tradition surrounding Edwards began with an altogether different understanding that could not account for what Jesus actually taught. The Puritan perspective began with angry sinners and projected that upon God. Anger begins with fear, uncertainty, discomfort, and the inability to control one’s environment, ot...
Read more

Our Language of Choice

Image
I woke up this morning and decided to be a woman. I really like the idea of earning less money on the job. I like the idea of being passed over for promotions. I like that I will be held more accountable for the care of my home and familial responsibilities than any of the men around me. I’m looking forward to having my expertise ignored. I like that I’ll more likely be treated as a lower-level assistant to male colleagues than an actual colleague. It should be a good experience to live as more of a target for domestic violence and abuse. It will be so freeing to let go of my bodily autonomy and place it in the hands of men who will not understand me. With so many voices in our society shifting back toward the attitudes of 70 years ago, I am really looking forward to setting aside all trappings of male privilege and power to live as a second class citizen whose voice and opinions are essentially irrelevant. Just look at all the advantages women have! They get t...
Read more