After Pentecost Devotional - Day 50

“But Jesus told him, 'Put your sword away. Anyone who lives by fighting will die by fighting. Don’t you know that I could ask my Father, and right away he would send me more than twelve armies of angels?'” Matthew 26:52-53

Peter had not really understood Jesus. None of the disciples had. They had heard Jesus speak of love, grace, and forgiveness, but the message of turning the other cheek had not really impacted them as it should have. A short time before these words in Matthew 26, Jesus had spoken about buying swords, but this response to Peter pulling one out seems to speak once more of just how little they continued to understand Jesus.

In a sense, it is impossible to understand Jesus the first time around. It is at minimum very hard to grasp either the intent of his words or how he expected them to be applied to the daily processes of living. Some of my friends want to apply the Sermon on the Mount, for example, only to life in the heavenly realm. Others would say that the ideals proposed are hyperbole, and not really to be applied literally to the experience of daily living.

Then we come to these words of Jesus and are called with Peter to reassess both the meaning and application of Jesus' three years of ministry. What do we do with Jesus' words? How do we apply them? Do we even try, or are we too set in our prejudiced views of how we ought to live our lives to bother with Jesus' instructions and values?

Peter was attempting to protect Jesus. He was wanting to use the sword at hand to offer Jesus a way out of the arrest by the crowd. He was hoping to allay the assailants and give Jesus a way out of the clutches of those come to do him harm. Jesus turned the topic to God's action, priorities, values, and potential for intervention. He wanted Peter to focus not on human solutions to circumstances, but on God's solutions. He wanted Peter to learn to trust God, rather than responses of fight or flight.

Our common reaction to physical threats is anything but spiritual. Our more instinctual way of responding is very animalistic or reptilian. It comes from the more autonomic portion of our brains, rather than from the frontal cortex. It is reactionary. It is neither thoughtful, reflective, or considered. It is most definitely not spiritual, and yet it is the spiritual, thoughtful, reflective response which Jesus called Peter.

Jesus wanted Peter to consider life from God's perspective rather than from the perspective of human limitations. Trust in God requires more than naming Christ as Lord, more than following a set of religious prescriptions, more than taking a stand against cultural norms. It requires that we shift from emotional reaction to introspection, from allowing our lives to be directed by fear to trust. It requires that we learn to place our insecurities in second place to confidence in God.

Peter saw a threat and responded viscerally. Jesus called him to respond in faith, out of confidence in God. Jesus called him to consider that God had numerous options from which to respond in redemption. None of that was necessary in this instance, as God's plans were already working for redemption. Peter was simply unprepared to see God at work beyond the boundaries of his fears and anxieties.

Determine to stop to reflect before reacting. Consider what God might want.


"Lord, transform my visceral reactions into thoughtful reflection on your priorities."

—©Copyright 2016, Christopher B. Harbin
http://www.sermonsearch.com/contributors/104427/ 
My latest books can be found here on amazon

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Gospel Is Not Conservative

Image
Fundamentalism and conservativism are intrinsically averse to change. They are tied with conserving a status quo or moving back to a former era. They seek a safe place, a respite from change and transformation in the world around them. They are threatened by new ideas. They fear that the foundations on which they base their lives will be uprooted, causing their view of reality to fall apart. Growth depends on change. Life requires change. Survival depends on responding to changes in our environment. It requires new ideas. It requires new answers to old questions, as well as new questions with even newer answers. Jesus was by no means conservative. Jesus challenged the status quo. He fought against the groundwork of much of the religious thought around him, as well as the structures erected to empower its values. He called out those who benefited from social, religious, and political power. He demonstrated God's love, forgiveness and grace to those deemed una...
Read more

God in the Hands of Angry Sinners

Image
Jonathan Edwards’ famous sermon, “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God,” set a very poor direction for much of Christianity in the Colonies. His Puritan tradition presented God as an essentially angry deity whose desire was to condemn and torture. Grace or mercy existed simply in regard to how long God waited until calling down judgment upon sinners. That is not good news. It never was. Such is not the message of Jesus whom the gospel writers claim as good news. They echo the words of the celestial messengers declaring Jesus’ birth as good news of great joy to all peoples. Rather than look to Jesus as the clearest example of God’s identity, character, and will, that tradition surrounding Edwards began with an altogether different understanding that could not account for what Jesus actually taught. The Puritan perspective began with angry sinners and projected that upon God. Anger begins with fear, uncertainty, discomfort, and the inability to control one’s environment, ot...
Read more

Our Language of Choice

Image
I woke up this morning and decided to be a woman. I really like the idea of earning less money on the job. I like the idea of being passed over for promotions. I like that I will be held more accountable for the care of my home and familial responsibilities than any of the men around me. I’m looking forward to having my expertise ignored. I like that I’ll more likely be treated as a lower-level assistant to male colleagues than an actual colleague. It should be a good experience to live as more of a target for domestic violence and abuse. It will be so freeing to let go of my bodily autonomy and place it in the hands of men who will not understand me. With so many voices in our society shifting back toward the attitudes of 70 years ago, I am really looking forward to setting aside all trappings of male privilege and power to live as a second class citizen whose voice and opinions are essentially irrelevant. Just look at all the advantages women have! They get t...
Read more