Redeeming the Cross

I grew up under the shadow of crosses. They decorated churches, Bibles, necklaces, and were portrayed in hymns, sermons, and evangelistic meetings. None of that, however, really presents what I have come to understand as the meaning and significance of the cross in the New Testament writings.

All those bronze, brass, iron, silver, gold, and wooden crosses have much more to do with how Constantine wielded the cross than anything written by Paul or spoken by Jesus. Constantine reported a vision in which he saw a cross of light and heard “in hoc signo vinces.” The vision was that under this sign (IHS), he should and would send out his conquering armies to victory. He was taking something referred to in Christianity and wielding it as a symbol of military might, of domination, of torture, of death, and of subjection and sending his troops to march under that sign of Rome’s Empire.

The cross goes back to the Greeks, who used it for their enemies. The Romans took the cross as they took many other things from the Greeks, and had wielded it for hundreds of years as an implement of torture and death. Constantine’s use of the cross carried this message of dominating power, coercion, and threat to all opposition. It was from that usage of the cross that it became a dominant symbol of Christianity as he brought the church into the power structures of his empire.

For Jesus and Paul, the cross carried a rather different message. They associated it with shame and reproach, of suffering the brunt of political power, of being deemed enemies of the state, of being stripped of any position or symbol of power and placed in a position of humiliation and powerlessness against Rome’s superior force. The viewed the cross from a place of oppression, their own oppression.

The cross meant that Jesus was no political leader. It meant that Jesus led no powerful armies against the enemies of God, the people, or the state. It deemed him a threat to political power. It marked him as a bug squashed under the foot of Rome’s generals and soldiers. It made him as one more insignificant bit of filth for Rome to discard.

That’s why Paul calls the cross a stumbling block and foolishness. How can Jesus be Messiah and be subjected to the humiliation of a cross? How can Jesus be Lord if he allowed Caesar’s minions to mistreat him so? How can this be God Almighty? God should be punishing all those who would dare do this to the Son, or even to a prophet! The cross looked for all purposes like the end of the road, casting reproach on Jesus and any who would follow him.

When Jesus told his disciples to take up their own crosses and follow him, it was no remark about a piece of jewelry to adorn their clothing. It was not as any symbol of power. It was about accepting that Jesus was leading them into the fray against the political powers of the world around them. It was embracing that to follow Jesus was subversive, revolutionary, and that it would get them killed. Following Jesus is not something the world powers would want them to do. They would have to accept the humiliation of being treated as human garbage by those who could not understand God’s love.

I still wear a cross. Which meaning it will communicate depends on what I do with the rest of my life, my words, my actions. Do I wear it as a conquering Roman or Crusader, or do I wear it with the understanding that my life is forfeit as I follow Jesus? The cross was a death sentence for Jesus and his disciples. If we can own it as our own death sentence, perhaps the cross can be redeemed.



— ©Copyright 2024, Christopher B. Harbin 



http://www.sermonsearch.com/contributors/104427/

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Gospel Is Not Conservative

Image
Fundamentalism and conservativism are intrinsically averse to change. They are tied with conserving a status quo or moving back to a former era. They seek a safe place, a respite from change and transformation in the world around them. They are threatened by new ideas. They fear that the foundations on which they base their lives will be uprooted, causing their view of reality to fall apart. Growth depends on change. Life requires change. Survival depends on responding to changes in our environment. It requires new ideas. It requires new answers to old questions, as well as new questions with even newer answers. Jesus was by no means conservative. Jesus challenged the status quo. He fought against the groundwork of much of the religious thought around him, as well as the structures erected to empower its values. He called out those who benefited from social, religious, and political power. He demonstrated God's love, forgiveness and grace to those deemed una...
Read more

God in the Hands of Angry Sinners

Image
Jonathan Edwards’ famous sermon, “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God,” set a very poor direction for much of Christianity in the Colonies. His Puritan tradition presented God as an essentially angry deity whose desire was to condemn and torture. Grace or mercy existed simply in regard to how long God waited until calling down judgment upon sinners. That is not good news. It never was. Such is not the message of Jesus whom the gospel writers claim as good news. They echo the words of the celestial messengers declaring Jesus’ birth as good news of great joy to all peoples. Rather than look to Jesus as the clearest example of God’s identity, character, and will, that tradition surrounding Edwards began with an altogether different understanding that could not account for what Jesus actually taught. The Puritan perspective began with angry sinners and projected that upon God. Anger begins with fear, uncertainty, discomfort, and the inability to control one’s environment, ot...
Read more

Our Language of Choice

Image
I woke up this morning and decided to be a woman. I really like the idea of earning less money on the job. I like the idea of being passed over for promotions. I like that I will be held more accountable for the care of my home and familial responsibilities than any of the men around me. I’m looking forward to having my expertise ignored. I like that I’ll more likely be treated as a lower-level assistant to male colleagues than an actual colleague. It should be a good experience to live as more of a target for domestic violence and abuse. It will be so freeing to let go of my bodily autonomy and place it in the hands of men who will not understand me. With so many voices in our society shifting back toward the attitudes of 70 years ago, I am really looking forward to setting aside all trappings of male privilege and power to live as a second class citizen whose voice and opinions are essentially irrelevant. Just look at all the advantages women have! They get t...
Read more