Unto Caesar and Unto God

It is all too easy to confuse politics and faith. It is all too easy to allow one to influence the other without noting the separation or which is calling the shots. In the aftermath, we look at the results of our preaching, teaching, and voting and are not exactly sure whom or what to blame.
For believers in Jesus Christ, we are supposedly following Jesus and Jesus' teachings. Unfortunately, we often do nothing of the kind. Without our even recognizing it, we often fall into the trap of allowing faith to be a euphemism for belonging to a religious club. We surround ourselves with religious phrases and icons but never really allow the actual teachings of Jesus to make an impact on our lives.
You see, Jesus calls us to things that are difficult to accomplish, even when we want to do so. He calls us to love our enemies. He calls us to visit the imprisoned. He calls us to befriend sinners. He calls us to forgive those who would hurt us, even when they respond by hurting us the same way 77 times in the same day. He calls us to carry our cross. He calls us to take the part of the stranger, poor, beggar, enemy, and injured without regard to how it might impact our own well-being.
Instead of taking Jesus to heart, we reinterpret his words to make them more convenient. We take the challenge to give generously to the poor as meaning that we should take our leftovers to a family in need. We take Jesus' words about loving our enemies to not include those we fear, be they Black, Latino, or Muslim. We take Jesus' words about feeding the hungry to mean serving at the soup kitchen once a month as a church in which a handful participate. We take Jesus' words about making disciples of the nations to mean five bucks in the offering plate for world missions.
We also take Jesus' words an relegate them to the sphere of what happens at the church's sanctuary or fellowship hall. We try to protect the rest of our lives from Jesus' interference. We don't let the gospel attach itself to our politics, unless maybe in relation to a single issue. The problem is that when we do that we fail to assess what Jesus' words on caring for all persons in need really mean.
Instead of allowing our political views to be influenced by how Jesus taught us to live, we do the opposite. We take our traditional political views and use them to frame our religious lives. You see, as evangelicals, especially in the South, we have inherited a political tradition that has kept people of color at arms length for generations. I was taught in Mississippi that Black people could not come to church with me. I was taught that I could go to work with them, but not have them over for a meal. I was taught that missions to Latin America was great, but that Latinos were not any more welcome within the structures of the church here than Blacks.
Over the last 25 years or so, I have seen some changes in those attitudes, but not enough to say we have gone from not following Jesus to following Jesus. I've heard concerns over whether Latinos up for service as deacons were in the US legally or not. Jesus makes no such distinction. Jesus simply tells us to love our neighbors the way God has loved us and to welcome them with open arms. Instead of given preference to what Jesus would call us to do, we have most often listened to what our political parties would tell us to do. That is a problem.
When we can ignore Jesus' teachings because they do not coincide with our political views or party platforms, we are not following Jesus. We are simply "Taking the name of the Lord in vain." Being a people of faith has repercussions in our political lives, simply because the lordship of Jesus demands the submission of every aspect of our being.
Within the church, it is not, and should not be a question of liberal, conservative, Republican, or Democrat. It should be a question of what Jesus tells us to do. While we do get a sense from Jesus that we should obey laws or be willing to pay the consequences, the only direct command we have in terms of relating to others is to love them. By love, Jesus means we are to care for their needs as though they were our own.
Thus, caring for strangers, people of color different from our own, nationalities different from our own, religions and religious perspectives different from our own, and political persuasions different from our own are not issues in any shape, form, or fashion. Politics should not keep us from following Jesus, unless, of course, we were never following Jesus in the first place.
*-*-*
© Copyright 2017 Christopher B. Harbin
http://www.sermonsearch.com/contributors/104427/
My latest book can be found at: https://www.amazon.com/dp/1520737602/

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Gospel Is Not Conservative

Image
Fundamentalism and conservativism are intrinsically averse to change. They are tied with conserving a status quo or moving back to a former era. They seek a safe place, a respite from change and transformation in the world around them. They are threatened by new ideas. They fear that the foundations on which they base their lives will be uprooted, causing their view of reality to fall apart. Growth depends on change. Life requires change. Survival depends on responding to changes in our environment. It requires new ideas. It requires new answers to old questions, as well as new questions with even newer answers. Jesus was by no means conservative. Jesus challenged the status quo. He fought against the groundwork of much of the religious thought around him, as well as the structures erected to empower its values. He called out those who benefited from social, religious, and political power. He demonstrated God's love, forgiveness and grace to those deemed una...
Read more

God in the Hands of Angry Sinners

Image
Jonathan Edwards’ famous sermon, “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God,” set a very poor direction for much of Christianity in the Colonies. His Puritan tradition presented God as an essentially angry deity whose desire was to condemn and torture. Grace or mercy existed simply in regard to how long God waited until calling down judgment upon sinners. That is not good news. It never was. Such is not the message of Jesus whom the gospel writers claim as good news. They echo the words of the celestial messengers declaring Jesus’ birth as good news of great joy to all peoples. Rather than look to Jesus as the clearest example of God’s identity, character, and will, that tradition surrounding Edwards began with an altogether different understanding that could not account for what Jesus actually taught. The Puritan perspective began with angry sinners and projected that upon God. Anger begins with fear, uncertainty, discomfort, and the inability to control one’s environment, ot...
Read more

Our Language of Choice

Image
I woke up this morning and decided to be a woman. I really like the idea of earning less money on the job. I like the idea of being passed over for promotions. I like that I will be held more accountable for the care of my home and familial responsibilities than any of the men around me. I’m looking forward to having my expertise ignored. I like that I’ll more likely be treated as a lower-level assistant to male colleagues than an actual colleague. It should be a good experience to live as more of a target for domestic violence and abuse. It will be so freeing to let go of my bodily autonomy and place it in the hands of men who will not understand me. With so many voices in our society shifting back toward the attitudes of 70 years ago, I am really looking forward to setting aside all trappings of male privilege and power to live as a second class citizen whose voice and opinions are essentially irrelevant. Just look at all the advantages women have! They get t...
Read more