Christian Zealotry

Paul was an extremist, a zealot. Protecting the integrity of Judaism and Torah was his mission. His purpose was to bring Israel into God’s good graces, that Messiah might come, deliver Israel from Roman oppression, and re-establish the Davidic monarchy.

Going to Damascus to imprison and kill followers of Jesus, Paul was struck blind. That changed his life’s direction. Being zealous for God did not change. His methods, strategies, character, and purpose, however, shifted dramatically. He was as committed as ever. He just accepted that violence against people was misdirected and ill-conceived. God needed no crusaders to wield violence, coercion, and intimidation in God’s name. God wanted us embracing the greater commandment of love.

Embracing Jesus as Messiah set aside political goals for Israel. Violence became an inappropriate tool for advancing Jesus’ good news of grace. Paul left those who leveled unfounded accusations against Jesus or his followers. He now bore the brunt of the violence and the slander hurled against him, the same he had once hurled.

In one sense, Paul was still an extremist. He was completely dedicated to following God. Zealotry took on a wholly new character and methods of interaction. Paul’s reborn extremism made him look much more like Jesus.

Jesus’ extremism is in the use of grace, love, and mercy.

Jesus’ extremism is living for the welfare of others.

It is generosity and kindness.

It is expanding the reach of God’s grace and love.

It wields peace and setting aside fear, force, violence, and coercion.

It accepts those we tend to be the least comfortable including at our tables.

It includes Judas in the last supper, even washing his feet.

It forgives Peter before Peter had yet denied him.

That’s not the extremism we normally see. It is the only kind that resonates with the character of Christ Jesus. If our actions don’t smell like Jesus, they are not of Christ. Wielding Christianity to advance a political agenda that harms people God loves is never of Christ. It takes Christ's name in vain.



— ©Copyright 2023, Christopher B. Harbin 



http://www.sermonsearch.com/contributors/104427/

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Gospel Is Not Conservative

Image
Fundamentalism and conservativism are intrinsically averse to change. They are tied with conserving a status quo or moving back to a former era. They seek a safe place, a respite from change and transformation in the world around them. They are threatened by new ideas. They fear that the foundations on which they base their lives will be uprooted, causing their view of reality to fall apart. Growth depends on change. Life requires change. Survival depends on responding to changes in our environment. It requires new ideas. It requires new answers to old questions, as well as new questions with even newer answers. Jesus was by no means conservative. Jesus challenged the status quo. He fought against the groundwork of much of the religious thought around him, as well as the structures erected to empower its values. He called out those who benefited from social, religious, and political power. He demonstrated God's love, forgiveness and grace to those deemed una...
Read more

God in the Hands of Angry Sinners

Image
Jonathan Edwards’ famous sermon, “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God,” set a very poor direction for much of Christianity in the Colonies. His Puritan tradition presented God as an essentially angry deity whose desire was to condemn and torture. Grace or mercy existed simply in regard to how long God waited until calling down judgment upon sinners. That is not good news. It never was. Such is not the message of Jesus whom the gospel writers claim as good news. They echo the words of the celestial messengers declaring Jesus’ birth as good news of great joy to all peoples. Rather than look to Jesus as the clearest example of God’s identity, character, and will, that tradition surrounding Edwards began with an altogether different understanding that could not account for what Jesus actually taught. The Puritan perspective began with angry sinners and projected that upon God. Anger begins with fear, uncertainty, discomfort, and the inability to control one’s environment, ot...
Read more

Our Language of Choice

Image
I woke up this morning and decided to be a woman. I really like the idea of earning less money on the job. I like the idea of being passed over for promotions. I like that I will be held more accountable for the care of my home and familial responsibilities than any of the men around me. I’m looking forward to having my expertise ignored. I like that I’ll more likely be treated as a lower-level assistant to male colleagues than an actual colleague. It should be a good experience to live as more of a target for domestic violence and abuse. It will be so freeing to let go of my bodily autonomy and place it in the hands of men who will not understand me. With so many voices in our society shifting back toward the attitudes of 70 years ago, I am really looking forward to setting aside all trappings of male privilege and power to live as a second class citizen whose voice and opinions are essentially irrelevant. Just look at all the advantages women have! They get t...
Read more