Is Being LGBTQ+ Some Unpardonable Sin?

I’m constantly running across people who run up against the interpretation they have been given of a few Bible verses that supposedly condemn homosexuality. The concern is that we would have to twist Scripture to interpret in any other way than this received condemnation. This is not the first time and the first issue that church and society struggled with changing a received traditional stance on one thing or another. We had virtually the same argument over slavery, over racism, over baptism, over which version of the Bible to use, over music styles and their place in worship, and appropriate dress for participation in church services.

I would present the following questions for reflection for those having difficulty accepting that maybe traditional interpretations and attitudes about people in the LGBTQ+ community. I’d never expect that everyone agree with me on everything. If we can’t at least entertain questions, however, we would have to be very sure about our positions if we consider them of any significance.

1. How many times does the Bible state that we are to love others? Does the Bible make exceptions to this requirement?

2. How did Jesus treat those hated Samaritans who had intermarried beyond Judaism, used a different edition of the Torah, worshiped in the wrong location, and did not fall in line with strict obedience to Mosaic laws of ritual purity and traditional Jewish interpretations?

3. How did the church resolve its conflict in Acts 15 over allowing Gentiles into the community in terms of requirements to first become Jews? How many legal edicts regarding purity, circumcision, and worshiping at the Temple did that decision counter?

4. When James says God cannot be tempted and does not tempt people, he counters other texts in Scripture that appear to say the opposite. (Genesis 22; 1st Samuel 25; Matthew 4; Luke 4; Hebrews 4:15)

5. Jesus reportedly declared all foods clean, despite prohibitions in Torah. Peter still had trouble with that in Acts 10. It was still an issue in the church in Acts 15 and Romans 14. When, how, and why did this issue fade away?

6. Jesus summarizes all of God's will into loving God and loving one another. How far should we go toward saying that something can only be sin if it is unloving or harmful to others?

7. What grounds do we have for elevating sexual orientation and gender identity as greater issues than greed, lying, or withholding help to the sick, hungry, thirsty, unhoused, immigrant, or stranger? We tend to say that we are against “the lifestyle” or practice of homosexuality. The church, especially in the South, has a deep history of being defiantly racist. More recently, we have seen loud declarations of xenophobia against immigrants from the same line of churches, leaders, and congregants. Would that disqualify those pastors, leaders, and parishioners from being acceptable to positions we deny to the LGBTQ+ community? If not, on what basis do we draw the distinction? What is the Scriptural basis for it?

8. If Jesus did not come into the world to condemn the world (John 3:17), what authority do we have to cast blanket condemnation upon one specific community in particular? How is that loving or redemptive?

I would challenge you to sit with these questions, not as an attack, not as condemnatory. Sit with them in reflection, prayer, and study. “Study and show yourself approved” (2 Timothy 2:15) is an ongoing charge and challenge for continual growth. Then I would have one final question. How have you communicated love to those of the LGBTQ+ community in any meaningful way that they can recognize as love? (1st John 4:20, “If you do not love your sibling whom you see, how can you love God whom you can’t see?”)

“In this shall all know that you are my disciples, that you love one another.” – John 13:35.



— ©Copyright 2023, Christopher B. Harbin 



http://www.sermonsearch.com/contributors/104427/

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Gospel Is Not Conservative

Image
Fundamentalism and conservativism are intrinsically averse to change. They are tied with conserving a status quo or moving back to a former era. They seek a safe place, a respite from change and transformation in the world around them. They are threatened by new ideas. They fear that the foundations on which they base their lives will be uprooted, causing their view of reality to fall apart. Growth depends on change. Life requires change. Survival depends on responding to changes in our environment. It requires new ideas. It requires new answers to old questions, as well as new questions with even newer answers. Jesus was by no means conservative. Jesus challenged the status quo. He fought against the groundwork of much of the religious thought around him, as well as the structures erected to empower its values. He called out those who benefited from social, religious, and political power. He demonstrated God's love, forgiveness and grace to those deemed una...
Read more

God in the Hands of Angry Sinners

Image
Jonathan Edwards’ famous sermon, “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God,” set a very poor direction for much of Christianity in the Colonies. His Puritan tradition presented God as an essentially angry deity whose desire was to condemn and torture. Grace or mercy existed simply in regard to how long God waited until calling down judgment upon sinners. That is not good news. It never was. Such is not the message of Jesus whom the gospel writers claim as good news. They echo the words of the celestial messengers declaring Jesus’ birth as good news of great joy to all peoples. Rather than look to Jesus as the clearest example of God’s identity, character, and will, that tradition surrounding Edwards began with an altogether different understanding that could not account for what Jesus actually taught. The Puritan perspective began with angry sinners and projected that upon God. Anger begins with fear, uncertainty, discomfort, and the inability to control one’s environment, ot...
Read more

Our Language of Choice

Image
I woke up this morning and decided to be a woman. I really like the idea of earning less money on the job. I like the idea of being passed over for promotions. I like that I will be held more accountable for the care of my home and familial responsibilities than any of the men around me. I’m looking forward to having my expertise ignored. I like that I’ll more likely be treated as a lower-level assistant to male colleagues than an actual colleague. It should be a good experience to live as more of a target for domestic violence and abuse. It will be so freeing to let go of my bodily autonomy and place it in the hands of men who will not understand me. With so many voices in our society shifting back toward the attitudes of 70 years ago, I am really looking forward to setting aside all trappings of male privilege and power to live as a second class citizen whose voice and opinions are essentially irrelevant. Just look at all the advantages women have! They get t...
Read more