Fundamentalism's Fatal Flaw

There are lots of problems with fundamentalism, but perhaps the biggest in my perspective has to do with the way it builds its portrait of reality. It’s good to remember that fundamentalism comes in a host of flavors. There is fundamentalism in Muslim garb, Jewish robes, and Christian attire. There is even fundamentalism attached to Hinduism, which should seem a complete impossibility for a religion with myriad expressions of the divine. I have also encountered fundamentalism among a few who call themselves atheists. One thing we often fail to grasp, however, is that fundamentalism is not so much a religious perspective. It is rather a way of building a model of reality that requires strict adherence to a set of unyielding beliefs.

Fundamentalism builds a structure of reality that is akin to a house of cards. If I pull out one card, the whole structure may come crashing down. When we add to that the fact that no two fundamentalists actually agree on everything, we have an immediate problem. Either I have to convince you to adhere to my belief system, or I will have to adopt yours wholesale. If neither of those things occurs, one of us is simply shutting out our conflict or we feel our very existence is being threatened.

Fundamentalism cannot abide wiggle room, in the same way vibrations are dangerous to a house of cards. We are not simply disagreeing over which flavor of ice cream is better. We are disagreeing about our system of beliefs which is the basis for our security and personal well-being. If I have to change my mind about one thing, it likely impacts another issue it has been supporting. That in turn weakens the foundation and stability of the entire system. Questioning one of my beliefs is thus a full scale attack on me as a person. If I let to of the raft to which I am clinging, I might sink and drown, despite your claim that the water is only two feet deep. The longer and harder I have been clinging to this raft, the more difficult it will be for me to let go. Hearing you make some claim of truth or evidence is not likely to have much impact. You probably just want me to drown, after all. That must be why you are attacking me.

That does not quite mean a fundamentalist cannot learn. Rather, it is exceedingly difficult to learn things which counter an established belief system. Astrophysics is likely removed enough from that belief system, unless I happen to hold to a flat-earth belief system. Studying dermatology may remain a safe area of inquiry and learning, at least until it addresses an underlying, hard-fast anti-evolution belief set. Of course, evolution theory itself might not be a problem until it looks specifically toward human evolution, dating of the earth, or some other particular notions that belong to my particular belief system.

It is holding to the integrity of one’s belief system that lies at the heart of what I would consider the most basic problem with fundamentalism. When my belief system is being “attacked” by arguments, logic, new ideas, experiences, or new information, there is no real distinguishing opposition to a particular belief and the person holding that belief. My belief set is not simply a system to be protected. It is a belief system in which my identity and security are inseparably linked. Rather than sending me back to the drawing board to rethink how I approach a particular issue, a belief challenge feels like a direct attack on my person. That belief system may even include some of those people to whom I have looked for leadership, at whose feet I have sat as a disciple, those whom I would consider the authorities within my system of belief.

Demagoguery easily rises to the top. If you challenge my leader, you challenge the beliefs I have received from said leader, the beliefs tied to my relationship with that leader, or the beliefs I hold in common with that leader. I may be able to readily say that we are all sinners, fallible, and fall short, but when it comes down to brass tacks, my self and beliefs are tied very closely together. My beliefs and my trust in my leaders are virtually inseparable. A fundamentalist mindset may operate very much like a cult whose esteemed leader can do no wrong.

It is easier to close my eyes to the wrong staring me in the face than to go back to re-evaluate the whole system on which I have staked my security, sense of self, belonging, worth, and place in the world around me. Being dislodged from that ground of safety is a threat to my very existence, just as much as letting go of a life raft amid the waters of a storm surging around me. Perhaps you tell me the water is only two feet deep, but if I trust your words, I run the risk of being drowned and lost at sea. Accepting I might be wrong can feel exceedingly dangerous. It is a threat to my survival.



— ©Copyright 2023, Christopher B. Harbin 



http://www.sermonsearch.com/contributors/104427/

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Gospel Is Not Conservative

Image
Fundamentalism and conservativism are intrinsically averse to change. They are tied with conserving a status quo or moving back to a former era. They seek a safe place, a respite from change and transformation in the world around them. They are threatened by new ideas. They fear that the foundations on which they base their lives will be uprooted, causing their view of reality to fall apart. Growth depends on change. Life requires change. Survival depends on responding to changes in our environment. It requires new ideas. It requires new answers to old questions, as well as new questions with even newer answers. Jesus was by no means conservative. Jesus challenged the status quo. He fought against the groundwork of much of the religious thought around him, as well as the structures erected to empower its values. He called out those who benefited from social, religious, and political power. He demonstrated God's love, forgiveness and grace to those deemed una...
Read more

God in the Hands of Angry Sinners

Image
Jonathan Edwards’ famous sermon, “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God,” set a very poor direction for much of Christianity in the Colonies. His Puritan tradition presented God as an essentially angry deity whose desire was to condemn and torture. Grace or mercy existed simply in regard to how long God waited until calling down judgment upon sinners. That is not good news. It never was. Such is not the message of Jesus whom the gospel writers claim as good news. They echo the words of the celestial messengers declaring Jesus’ birth as good news of great joy to all peoples. Rather than look to Jesus as the clearest example of God’s identity, character, and will, that tradition surrounding Edwards began with an altogether different understanding that could not account for what Jesus actually taught. The Puritan perspective began with angry sinners and projected that upon God. Anger begins with fear, uncertainty, discomfort, and the inability to control one’s environment, ot...
Read more

Our Language of Choice

Image
I woke up this morning and decided to be a woman. I really like the idea of earning less money on the job. I like the idea of being passed over for promotions. I like that I will be held more accountable for the care of my home and familial responsibilities than any of the men around me. I’m looking forward to having my expertise ignored. I like that I’ll more likely be treated as a lower-level assistant to male colleagues than an actual colleague. It should be a good experience to live as more of a target for domestic violence and abuse. It will be so freeing to let go of my bodily autonomy and place it in the hands of men who will not understand me. With so many voices in our society shifting back toward the attitudes of 70 years ago, I am really looking forward to setting aside all trappings of male privilege and power to live as a second class citizen whose voice and opinions are essentially irrelevant. Just look at all the advantages women have! They get t...
Read more