Interrogating the Church, 03 – Fallibility and Faith:

Is there room in my faith for questions? Is there room for growth? Is there room for new conclusions? Is there room for deeper understandings that diverge from what I have believed in the past or hold to still? Should there be?

At the heart of fundamentalism lies a basic concern with change. Is faith static, unchanging, and immutable, or is faith a growing appreciation of what may indeed be static, unchanging, and immutable. Must my set of answers or beliefs be defined together as one coherent whole, or is there value to faith when it is yet under development and I am not certain where it is eventually taking me? What is the relationship between my fallibility, my faith, and God who by definition is beyond my comprehension?

Many have attempted to answer these questions by making the Bible out to be infallible or inerrant. They have claimed that in order for the Bible to be God’s Word, it cannot contain any kind of error, due to God’s immutability and inability to lie. Along with claims about the Bible being infallible, they have claimed their interpretation of the Bible beyond interrogation. Too often, that has given little room for growth in the understanding embedded in their faith traditions. Any disagreement with their faith tradition is seen as an attack on the whole of their faith and a direct attack on the Bible.

On the other hand, there is faith in God that maintains room for growth, better understanding, change, and taking stock of new information, contexts, or developments. It also recognizes our understanding of the Bible as a changing reality. What I took as certain a decade ago may not seem as close to what I understand as truth today. Perhaps that is due to growth in my appreciation of the Bible, growth in my appreciation of God and God’s character, growth in my understanding of humanity, or some combination of the three.

Then there are some who approach the Bible as though it were indeed the domain of those with a determinedly definite interpretation. Rather than include room for interpreting the Bible differently and retaining its value and validity, they opt to ignore the Bible as irrelevant. They seem to accept uncritically that it can only be interpreted as the fundamentalists have interpreted it. That presumption is, to my view, just as irresponsible as a faith which must be protected from any doubt and question.

The fundamentalist perspective strikes me as pure hubris: we know the truth and all other claims are categorically wrong. Then again the third perspective is a similar hubris: everything you claim and anything the Bible might say is of no value whatsoever. Ancient wisdom passed down and preserved over millennia is bound to include something worthwhile to humanity in our own day, even while it perceives the world in grossly unscientific terms which can be overlooked as pre-scientific.

I learned many things from my grandparents. I also recognize some of what they taught me as incorrect or inappropriate. The one does not invalidate the other. I can honor and respect some of what they passed on to me, even as I move past other things like racism, environmental harm, or following false prophets.

My faith is fallible, because I am fallible. My faith is also a journey of growth and development. Were I to claim the Bible as infallible, it would remain subject to my fallible interpretations and understanding. If I take Paul seriously in stating that we see only dimly as though looking in a bronze mirror, but shall eventually see more directly, my faith must make room for accepting those current limitations. Anything less is simply dishonest.

Where faith has no room for questions, doubts, and growth, it is dead, frozen in a lost page of history. Meanwhile, the Bible calls us to consistent personal reflection and finding new ways to apply grace and love to the changing environment in which we live and move. It is not a collection of statements about God, theology, and faith. It is a challenging mirror calling for a living response.



— ©Copyright 2023, Christopher B. Harbin 



http://www.sermonsearch.com/contributors/104427/

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Gospel Is Not Conservative

Image
Fundamentalism and conservativism are intrinsically averse to change. They are tied with conserving a status quo or moving back to a former era. They seek a safe place, a respite from change and transformation in the world around them. They are threatened by new ideas. They fear that the foundations on which they base their lives will be uprooted, causing their view of reality to fall apart. Growth depends on change. Life requires change. Survival depends on responding to changes in our environment. It requires new ideas. It requires new answers to old questions, as well as new questions with even newer answers. Jesus was by no means conservative. Jesus challenged the status quo. He fought against the groundwork of much of the religious thought around him, as well as the structures erected to empower its values. He called out those who benefited from social, religious, and political power. He demonstrated God's love, forgiveness and grace to those deemed una...
Read more

God in the Hands of Angry Sinners

Image
Jonathan Edwards’ famous sermon, “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God,” set a very poor direction for much of Christianity in the Colonies. His Puritan tradition presented God as an essentially angry deity whose desire was to condemn and torture. Grace or mercy existed simply in regard to how long God waited until calling down judgment upon sinners. That is not good news. It never was. Such is not the message of Jesus whom the gospel writers claim as good news. They echo the words of the celestial messengers declaring Jesus’ birth as good news of great joy to all peoples. Rather than look to Jesus as the clearest example of God’s identity, character, and will, that tradition surrounding Edwards began with an altogether different understanding that could not account for what Jesus actually taught. The Puritan perspective began with angry sinners and projected that upon God. Anger begins with fear, uncertainty, discomfort, and the inability to control one’s environment, ot...
Read more

Our Language of Choice

Image
I woke up this morning and decided to be a woman. I really like the idea of earning less money on the job. I like the idea of being passed over for promotions. I like that I will be held more accountable for the care of my home and familial responsibilities than any of the men around me. I’m looking forward to having my expertise ignored. I like that I’ll more likely be treated as a lower-level assistant to male colleagues than an actual colleague. It should be a good experience to live as more of a target for domestic violence and abuse. It will be so freeing to let go of my bodily autonomy and place it in the hands of men who will not understand me. With so many voices in our society shifting back toward the attitudes of 70 years ago, I am really looking forward to setting aside all trappings of male privilege and power to live as a second class citizen whose voice and opinions are essentially irrelevant. Just look at all the advantages women have! They get t...
Read more